Watched by more than 80 million people, last night’s first presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump had the feel of a heavyweight title fight. Donald Trump the boisterous, blustery, mean, undisciplined, heavy-hitting and much-hyped brawler has destroyed all his previous foes.
He is a bully who embraces his role as a destroyer of men. Across from him stood Clinton, an uninspiring, uninteresting and yet undeniably talented pugilist. Trump is a political bar fighter. Clinton is the measured political technician. Styles make fights.
The introductions would be made and the bell would ring. Trump threw haymakers and huge lazy punches. Clinton dodged and counterpunched. Trump became frustrated and angry. He desperately clinched. Clinton toyed with him. Trump looked to Lester Holt, the referee, for help. Little assistance would be forthcoming. Trump became increasingly flustered and angry that Clinton would not do him the kind favor of allowing herself to be hit.
Clinton would score punch after punch on the flummoxed Trump. She smiled and grinned. He sniffled; his skin possessed an unhealthy pallor. At a certain point in the 90-minute bout one could almost hear Howard Cosell bellowing from another time, not about Smokin’ Joe Frazier but the Donald: “Down goes Trump! Down goes Trump!”
Watching Trump stammer and in a discombobulated state, I was reminded of the following passage in Richard Hoffer’s great book “Bouts of Mania: Ali, Frazier, and Foreman — and an America on the Ropes”:
There were two more knockdowns — six in all — before the fight was finally called at 1:35 of the second round. None of the knockdowns was conclusive in itself; none showed the neural disconnect, a man going suddenly vacant, as if a switch had been flipped. But each showed a steady degradation of the nervous system, Frazier in less and less control of his body, his legs almost palsied, wobbling, as he attempted to keep his ground, assault after assault. Knockdown by knockdown, he was being reduced from heavyweight champion to a clumsy and helpless husk. It is a sad corollary. A fallen fighter is not simply defeated; he must look ridiculous as well. “A pitiful sight,” the local paper proclaimed. It was only after the sixth that Foreman, forever wary of Frazier, a kind of undead the way he kept getting up, allowed himself to believe he’d won. It was only after the sixth that Mercante stopped it.
Lester Holt did not possess the authority to stop Clinton from thrashing Trump. Nor did Trump have a corner man to throw in the towel. Neither Gennifer Flowers nor Corey Lewandowski would be so kind as to volunteer themselves as human shields for Trump’s benefit.
Trump would be defeated, and the end of the contest was a merciful thing that stopped the bloody beating.
I predicted that Donald Trump would defeat Hillary Clinton in their first presidential debate. I am so very glad that I was wrong.
I suggested that in order to defeat Trump, Clinton must undermine his ego, encourage his overreacting and ignore his bullying and brawling style. Clinton would also have to use the facts to repeatedly expose Trump as a liar. Clinton could also easily bait Trump because of his insecurities about women and his own masculinity. She did all of these things exceptionally well.
Clinton’s performance was not perfect. (She missed opportunities to highlight how his comments about being “smart” for not paying taxes imply that “regular Americans” are stupid or “losers.” Likewise, when Trump said Obama is “your president,” she could have countered with, “no, he is our president.”)
But overall, Clinton’s performance was still devastating. What should be terrifying for Donald Trump and his minions is that Clinton, having now tested him, will be even more dangerous and effective in the future.
Several weeks ago, Clinton signaled to one of Donald Trump’s greatest weaknesses — which she exploited to full effect Monday night.
During a fundraising dinner Hillary Clinton described Donald Trump’s racist, prejudiced, bigoted, white supremacist, misogynist, nativist and sexist supporters as a “basket of deplorables.” The American corporate news media and many pundits were stunned that a presidential candidate would describe millions of voters in such stark terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment